9 posts tagged “web”

Who knew I was this unpopular on Twitter?

   I not only do not have followers, apparently I owe Twitter one human soul.

Twitter apparently knows about its follower problem, as noted by my friend Emma Merkas at $30 Date Night. But it is still annoying when you block someone but they remain in your followers’ list. The latest variant is this, which is a slight improvement, as Twitter now acknowledges that the person has been blocked. Just that it hasn’t got around to taking them off one’s list of followers.

   There’s a very good reason you cannot see the image or the middle word in black there. And for those of us who have been plagued by this bot, it’s really the last user we want to see on Twitter.

I was trying to access the BMW page at Autocade, something I have done without any problem a few hours before. And the following error, which has come up before when visiting other sites (notably the Unofficial Austin Rover Resource) came up:

   The other pages work, just not the BMW one. I ask it to open in Firefox and I get this window:    Any clues on what this error is? The same page worked fine a while back, and I expect it will work fine in a few hours’ time. This is one of Firefox’s strange errors. A brief Google search on the error message either reveals nothing relevant, or it is all in gobbledegook. (One says the stylesheet is wrong, which begs the most logical question: how come the other pages all work?)

The below is a test, as Loudtwitter replied to me, and I agreed to helping with a bit of troubleshooting.

• 23:17 @Bosun_McShiny I could always guilt you into not looking at the site (many have pirated fonts). #
• 23:18 repeats an earlier Tweet for #followfriday: @delineate, @iKitty, @sharonhayes, @BradHoward, @paulmason10538, @w00fy and @bobgarrett. #
• 23:20 adds to #followfriday @Courageous_one, @noelbellen, @JoeGreenz, @MatchesMalone, @CindyKing and @invisiblesparks. #
• 23:20 @noelbellen Thank you for the @ for #followfriday! #
• 23:21 @joegreenz Thanks, D.! How did the present-buying go? #
• 23:23 @MatchesMalone You’re very welcome! Today’s bunch that I recommended is very good—some I know from Real World 1·0. #
• 23:25 @sassybella I’m going to have a look in to that Twitterfox you use! #
• 23:27 @Bosun_McShiny Darn! Looks like a late Friday night then! #
• 23:27 @joegreenz That definitely is a good buy! #
• 23:28 @MatchesMalone It’s quite colourful and I’m ready for the upgrade! #
• 23:29 @iKitty I thought I’d repeat the #followfriday post as I was way too early for most of the planet! #
• 23:31 blogged: Fun facts for February 2009 tinyurl.com/bbl88y #
• 23:31 blogged: Goodbye, Miss Brahms tinyurl.com/cxhdhy #
• 23:42 @joegreenz Ah, he has good taste then. #

Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

Today, I decided to join Vkontakte.ru, the Russian rival to Facebook. Facebook is changing its design and some folks pointed out that Vkontakte resembles an old Facebook, so I thought I would give it a try. If anyone wants to friend me there, I am under my real name. It is still not quite as polished as Facebook but it has a familiar interface. It is currently the world’s 30th ranked site (Facebook is 5th), according to Alexa Internet, which helped convince me it wasn’t a spam harvester.

I spotted the below on Ninemsn today and thought, ‘Poor Brian.’

   I clicked on the first link and found quite the opposite:    It’s not as embarrassing as the network, and the Murdoch Press, reporting on the Miranda Kerr incident two years late and getting the venue wrong, but it’s still an about-face.
   Netizens will be able to work out that the first link came about because the Ninemsn website reported that Delta Goodrem turned down boyfriend Brian McFadden’s marriage proposal. Then, the site’s staff found out more and had to instantly change the piece, but due to caching or the way the Ninemsn site is structured, the headline link on another page had not changed.
   This is not abnormal and at least the link goes to an accurate item of news.
   And Ninemsn was not alone, as Murdochs did the same thing:
   It all makes me wonder about the wisdom of such immediacy when it comes to the gossip press. Usually, the items are of little significance. They are disposable news, so what harm is there with a brief delay to get the facts right? The contrary argument is that since these items are inconsequential, then why should the facts need to be dead right?
   I realize that’s not the way celeb-based factoid-reporting works, and on the web, even more rules get chucked out in the quest to be the first on to Google News with the headline.
   But we are representatives of the media. We are, supposedly, journalists and editors and publishers. And as the fourth estate, we have a duty to the public.
   Call me a traditionalist, but I would prefer to get everything straight before committing to press in any medium, even if it means a delay.
   After the Miranda Kerr embarrassment, propagated by Sky, news.com.au and The Daily Telegraph (Australia) newspaper, I have had to conclude that I can’t trust Murdoch Press items at all. Before this week I took only The Sun and News of the World items with a grain of salt (remember all the speculation about who the next James Bond would be?), but am saddened to have to apply the same doubts across more of the Murdoch Press. Especially since the chief himself, Mr Keith Rupert Murdoch, has (thank goodness) vowed to up the journalistic standards at papers such as The Wall Street Journal.
   Maybe I should not lecture since I have never been on dailies, but my feeling is that the damage to goodwill across a group is too great when this sort of misreporting starts happening regularly.

I love it. Dr Jay Parkinson of Brooklyn, NY, has gone online with his practice:

http://www.inter-actions.biz/blog/2007/10/is_there_a_doctor_in_the_house.html

That means you can reach him via electronic means and he will do diagnoses accordingly, even after hours for emergencies.
   Now, I would love to see lawyers do this. Even an e-court. Parties or their attorneys feed in their evidence to a site with limited fields and a judge decides. No emotion, no BS. The decision comes swiftly. Any mitigating factors can be fed in, but lawyers would be encouraged to write everything briefly. They would be unable to hide extra charges. And if they think anything’s been missed, then the process could go to appeal before a live court.
   It would lower the price of getting justice because the system would no longer need to support a live District Court, and appeals would be at the current price of the original claim. It would also make things faster.
   Best of all, the legal profession, branded as shysters even in Shakespeare’s day, would appear more transparent. It would start going up the ladder in people’s minds.
   I would love to see a country like Singapore, or even New Zealand, give this sort of thing a shot. Singapore prides itself on e-governmental processes and this would be an ultimate test. New Zealand’s system is far too entrenched but I’d love to see a party adopt this idea.
   It’s far too radical for Labour, and certainly would be gobbledegook for National.
   Greens? United Future? The Alliance?

By 2009 or 2010, we’ll see some amazing, swish, but ultimately home-made and favour-using advertising campaigns for small businesses through YouTube. These aren’t corporations targeting the web, nor are they adaptations of ads made for other media. We’ll all marvel, and we’ll consider these campaigns the turning points; how they use the sort of special effects we have seen on The Lord of the Rings and the like. They might even come from unexpected countries, probably nations with strong ad heritages like Brazil, or innovative places like India. The commentators in the MSM will probably condemn it, and the global online audience will lap it all up.