7 posts tagged “sir edmund hillary”

080422 Dominion Post p 1 on Hillary Clinton

A lot of people call George W. Bush a dumbass, because they say he is ignorant about foreign policy and the names of leaders.
   Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton says she is smart and experienced, even if she has memory and “misspeaking” problems caused by sleep deprivation.
   Here’s the latest one that made the front page here in Wellington, New Zealand, in the Australian-owned Dominion Post newspaper. Sen. Clinton called Helen Clark the ‘former prime minister of New Zealand’ even though she’s still in office.
   If she gets in, Americans are still going to get comments about a dumbass, ignorant president from us. So much for restoring America’s international prestige—when she makes mistakes like this.
   No doubt it was caused by sleep deprivation again.
   If you can read the article, the latest Clinton “misstatement” managed to remind the New Zealand press about her gaffe that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, something later revealed to be complete fiction. The Bosnian sniper-fire incident is also in there.
   She’ll say anything, it seems—and in my book, that’s not presidential. The anti-Bush types say that if the world could have voted a US president, he would not have got in. It seems that if New Zealanders could vote in anyone into the White House from here, Hillary Clinton doesn’t look like our pick.

The televised funeral for Sir Ed was pretty darned good. Just as with President Ford’s funeral, it didn’t matter if one was Democrat or Republican: people were united to pay their respects to the man. Regardless of where you were watching the funeral, for a moment we were all New Zealanders.
   TV3 stopped its live coverage to focus on some commercial junk, but TV One persisted till the procession drove past Sir Ed and Lady Hillary’s home in Remuera before running the Peter Williams news programme. It was a respectful funeral and covered very well by TVNZ—hats off to the producers and camera crew who brought the images to many homes. Sir Edmund would have approved, I think: even though he was a humble man, I think he would have wanted all of us to have a chance to farewell him.
   Car nut note: the two Cadillac DTSs were probably the fanciest and newest hearses in the country.

It doesn’t really seem like Sir Edmund Hillary is gone, does it? We see his face on TV, just as we always did. Today, it’s beginning to hit as TV One and TV3 show live coverage of the funeral—the latter using the TVNZ footage but with a TVNZ logo in the top right-hand corner. If anyone shows advertisements during this, they are going to be slammed.
   Peter Hillary and his kids did a great job with their eulogies.

Nice to know that al-Jazeera is already covering the lead-up to the Sir Edmund Hillary funeral, with a huge piece just now on the news bulletin live from Auckland outside the Holy Trinity Cathedral, where his body is lying in state and people are paying their respects. Nothing of the sort on TV One and TV3 at the moment, though from what I remember, one of the networks will carry the actual funeral live. Good on al-Jazeera for being truly global.

The Dick van Dyke Show’s Rose Marie once told a story how her husband, Bobby Guy, got upset when the trumpeter at John F. Kennedy’s funeral missed a note. Everyone’s more sensitive when a national figure has died.
   In New Zealand, I had a similar but more subdued reaction when the TV3 journalist, in the six o’clock news’s lead item, referred to ‘Governor-Generals’—in that Sir Edmund Hillary is getting a state funeral, an exception to the rule that these are reserved for heads of state. Note to the Australian-owned network: Governors-General is the plural form.
   Then again, this is the same network that once referred to the ‘US Marine Corpse’, so I am not sure why I should be surprised.
   TV One’s That’s Life or How’s Life or Life or Life at 5.30 or whatever it was called—heck, everyone knew it as The Charlotte Dawson Show—had ‘pronounciation’ when discussing the topic, so I think that still takes the cake.
   How funny to be corrected by some dumb immigrant for whom English is his second language.

Fellow Voxer Bridget’s post on Sir Edmund Hillary’s passing expresses what many New Zealanders are feeling today.
   Not only has a great man left us, but the idea of a living hero has died with him. Our role models are far and few between, she argues, and she is right.
   I cheekily suggested that the only person who comes close to being a patriot is Peter Jackson, the filmmaker, for his resistance to relocate to Hollywood and his insistence on making his movies here.
   He is deserving of the title of a role model, though because of the time-frame of his success, he might not be regarded in quite the same heights as Sir Edmund—yet.
   Jackson is a paradigm-shifter in so far as he proved that New Zealand is capable of multiple Oscar winners that find mainstream audiences globally, but he is not one who proved that New Zealanders could make films. Earlier directors who did depart for Anglo–American shores did that.
   One could say that Sir Edmund Hillary was not the first man who proved that Kiwis could climb mountains, but it may be right for us to view his accomplishment with eyes opened more widely.
   In 2000 it would have been within the realm of imagination for a filmmaker to start something domestically. Maybe our imaginations would not have said anything at the level of a trilogy of Tolkien adaptations that would wind up doing a clean sweep at the Oscars, but we would have said it was possible to start mainstream film-making. Martin Campbell, for instance, was thinking of making Vertical Limit here.
   In the 1950s, with plenty of loss of life in other attempts, Edmund Hillary and his expedition proved what was considered impossible up to that point. 
   The prior loss of life is what adds to the heroic image of Sir Edmund Hillary, succeeding where human endeavour could not before him.
   So without Sir Edmund and if Peter Jackson does not qualify as a hero (though still someone to be hugely admired and respected), to whom do we turn today?
   As Bridget points out, the tall poppy syndrome is alive and well, and Sir Edmund might have been an exception in New Zealand as someone who could be considered a national treasure in his lifetime. Even if the syndrome is extinguished, Sir Edmund lived through years when it was rife. You literally had to do something as grand as climb Everest to get past it. And since 1953, we haven’t lauded anyone for their accomplishments to the same degree. We didn’t send a man to the moon, and we didn’t invent the internet. The slacker quiet-man mentality of the boys from Flight of the Conchords is disturbingly close to the national psyche on numerous levels.
   Hillary and Tenzing Norkay’s sons might have scaled Everest in tribute to their fathers, and that is no small feat, but just like the Fantasy Island TV remake, no matter how much better you do it, people remember the original more.
   I suppose, too, with the advances we have made in the last 50 years, there are fewer things we are calling ‘impossible’ unless we begin to think in greater mental leaps—maybe solving how UFOs supposedly get across light years in limited times, ending the dominance of the internal combustion engine as our way of getting around short distances on Earth or curing HIV and Aids.
   Institutionalization and politicization may have seen to our inability to really drive forward humanity, even if some geniuses out there may have worked out most of these problems.
   Sir Edmund Hillary reminds us that we can dream of the impossible and steadily work to achieve our goals.
   He may have scaled Everest in 1953 but he first became interested in mountain climbing before World War II, in the mid-1930s as a teenager. We are talking a 20-year dream that he steadily accomplished.
   There are no quick fixes. Bridget’s words: ‘In this age of google, paparazzi and cellphone cameras, sometimes it feels like there aren’t many heroes left: our sports stars peddle drugs and hook up with girls whose artificial breast size is greater than their IQ, our politicians lecture earnestly on the perils of violence then resort to fisticuffs if their moral highground proves shaky, that is when they’re not defrauding immigrants or getting let off from speeding tickets. Church ministers get a television audience and suddenly it’s Harley Davidsons and overseas travel.’
   All of these people she talks about are short-termers, people who are quite happy with flash-in-the-pan moments in the mainstream media, praised as though they were latter-day Hillarys deserving of our attention.
   In reality, no parent in their right mind would want their kids admiring any of these idiots.
   The paradigm-busters are there, bubbling under. New Zealand is an inspirational place so it is hard not to come up with a dream and to accomplish it. However, whether these people have a chance to surface given government policy or institutionalization or the tall-poppy syndrome or the foreign-owned media is another matter. They might even bugger off overseas as so many have done before them.
   We need to encourage them to come forward as individuals and know they will not be laughed at or ridiculed for having a dream.
   God knows that vacuum exists now more than ever.
   And we already know this. In fact, the National Government told us so in 1999, just before the General Election. The document, Bright Future, makes interesting reading in 2008 as we are reminded of lost opportunities. Of course, it was regarded as politicking back then and the programme was cancelled. On Google’s first results’ page, this PDF hosted by the UN is the only remnant of the brochure, whereas in 1999 it was stored domestically as well.
   In essence, Bright Future spoke of the need to foster innovation and to champion individuals. The tall-poppy syndrome, it argued, should die.
   Anyone who knows me know that I would not campaign for National—at least not the National in its present form—so please don’t read this as a National Party campaign advertisement.
   It needn’t have mattered if Bright Future came out of the Legalize Marijuana movement.
   It begs the question, regardless of the source: who is ready to shift paradigms? Or, who is prepared to make a Hillary Shift, one that shifts paradigms from ‘impossible’ to ‘possible’?

[Cross-posted] I don’t think anyone in this country, especially those of us in the media, could not pay some form of tribute to Sir Edmund Percival Hillary, NZOM, KG, who passed away aged 88 in Auckland Hospital today.
   Sir Edmund, the first man to conquer Mt Everest, is considered a national hero in New Zealand and before his death was the only living non-royal person to appear on the country’s banknotes.
   In a British expedition, New Zealand-born Hillary conquered the peak on May 29, 1953—days before Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation—with climbing partner Tenzing Norkay. Hillary was knighted in July that year.
   Born in 1919 in Tuakau, Hillary grew up in Auckland and became interested in mountain-climbing as a teenager. With his brother Rex, he was a professional beekeeper at the time of the conquest.
   After Everest, Sir Edmund reached the South Pole in 1958 and participated in the 1975 General Election in New Zealand. In 1985, he was appointed High Commissioner to India by the Labour Government.
   He was made a member of the New Zealand Order in 1987 and was appointed a Knight of the Order of the Garter in 1995.
   His reputation was international, making it in to Time’s 100 heroes and icons of the 20th century.
   Sir Edmund was active in philanthropy, both in Nepal and New Zealand.
   He is survived by two children. His first wife and daughter were killed in an air accident in Nepal in 1975.