Should ‘In God We Trust’ be removed from US currency?

Comments

Jack - Thanks for the link. It seems to me that secularists are bent on removing all historic and traditional references to God from the American square.

I will live to see the day when secularists will try to have all Christian Crosses removed from out cemeteries.

There will come a time when American churches will be advised that Christian Crosses cannot be displayed on top of churches, because the sight of a Christian Cross is offensive to someone.

I am a liberal Christian and have no interest in shoving my Christian views down the throats of non Christians. However, the freedom of religion should mean the freedom to worship and display faith symbols. Gosh, I got carried away.

Yep, but I think the two options offered by the survey are limiting. My question would be; what has God (whatever "version") got to do with a medium of exchange?

On a local tack, I think New Zealand should change it's anthem from "God Defend New Zealand".

No!
In God I Trust!

A law was passed by the 84th United States Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by the President on July 30, 1956. President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved a joint resolution declaring In God We Trust the national motto of the United States.[1] The same Congress had required, in the previous year, that the words appear on all currency, as a Cold War measure: "In these days when imperialistic and materialistic Communism seeks to attack and destroy freedom, it is proper" to "remind all of us of this self-evident truth" that "as long as this country trusts in God, it will prevail." [7]

WIKI

That is why.

Keep it. The separation clause does not prohibit religion or the acknowledgement of faith. It prohibits the endorsement of any particular faith.

I agree with Timothy that the anti-religion arc in the US has been too vocal. There is a local memorial park atop one of the highest hills here in San Diego -- it has a large concrete cross on top of it. There's been a movement to have it removed because it is "offensive", but yet when voting, over 80% of San Diegans said leave it be.

[這個好]
Timothy, I agree. Every religion should have the right to be practised. What I tend to see over in the US (at least through the media) are anti-Christian moves but other religions seem to be protected. It’s Rome all over again.
Robin, also agreed. The pollsters should have left it with a simple yes or no: the qualifiers necessarily bias the results a little. I don’t have a firm opinion on our national anthem. Call me a creature of habit but my gut says to leave it, though I have to say I have said on some occasions that I don’t think it’s that energetic compared to the US, France or even Australia.
Pat, good argument there. Beyond the religious argument, since you have passed it in law then it should remain—though as we saw with the gay marriage flap in California, that won’t stop some judges.
Steve, ‘the people have spoken’—80 per cent sure sounds sufficient to me.
It doesn't say "In Government We Trust" Thankfully
America has at its core, three principals. e pluribus unum (from many, one) In God We Trust and Liberty. These three in combination are what sets us apart. The liberal agenda is to destroy these founding principals. Multiculturalism is a direct assault on e pluribus unum. The attacks on Christianity in every venue from hate speech legislation to outlawing evangelism (proselytizing) to remove it from the public, and the fight to redistribute wealth in favor of equality rather than liberty.
Zak, I don’t think we should ever trust the government!
Judge Bob, there sure seems to be a lot of attacks on Christianity in the US, at least from what I observe down here.
What you're seeing Jack is true. I'm feeling it, all Christians are experiencing it (whether they pay attention to it or not). What is interesting is in every case that is brought up to vote about Christianity (or it's moral values) - the biggest percentage of Americans support it. It's very interesting how a very loud small majority constantly banging their drums with the help of activist judges can destroy the foundation of a country.
To an extent there are some similar movements here, though not as bad as over there (e.g. most people will say ‘Merry Christmas’ in December, even atheists; ‘Happy holidays’ is considered odd to most people). When terms such as God-botherer and Bible-basher are bandied about as everyday, however, then it is concerning.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Jack Yan

About Me

Jack Yan
New Zealand
‘I think they’re wonderful. They have so much courage! Here they are, hurling through space on a molten rock at 67,000 miles an hour, and the only thing that keeps them in their shoes is their misplaced faith in gravity.’—John Lithgow as Prof Dick Solomon, in Third Rock from the Sun
Bebo:
LucirePublisher
del.icio.us:
jackyan
Digg:
jackyan
Flickr:
lucire
MySpace:
jackyan
Other:
http://www.facebook.com/jack.yan
Technorati:
jackyan
Twitter:
jackyan
YouTube:
luciremagazine

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox

Magazines