Idiot’s guide to how the Iraq war started
I say that my work at JY&A Consulting is developing plain-English strategies for our clients. So, I thought I’d give the Iraq war a shot and write my recollections in summary form. The Saddam Hussein voice should be read in a South Park style. Steve Bridges plays George W. Bush, with Rory Bremner as Tony Blair. Special guest appearance by Rupert Murdoch.
Saddam Hussein: I gotta gas those Kurds. Let’s let off some WMDs. Where did I put that invitation to those terrorists?
Saddam’s sons-in-law: Saddam has WMDs. A lot of them.
UN: Under the ceasefire, you can’t have them. We’re sending inspectors in.
Inspectors: We found some but there’s more based on what he had before, and we can’t figure out where they are.
UN: Say, Saddam, you need to tell us where some of this stuff has gone to.
Saddam Hussein: Here’s a big-ass report. Chew on that.
UN: Dude, this isn’t complete. In fact, it looks like you have pulled it out of your ass.
Security Council president: Let’s have a vote on a resolution. Who says that we should punish Saddam Hussein if he doesn’t front up on info about his potential for WMDs, where he’s disposed of some of the ones the inspectors can’t find any more, and sort out the money he owes Kuwait?
Security Council members: Yes, we should!
Security Council president: Cool, 15 to 0. Wow, that’s better than that time Saddam invaded Kuwait.
UN: Well, Saddam, here’s resolution 1441. You’ll be in serious trouble if you don’t comply.
Saddam Hussein: Hey, don’t worry about it.
Iraqi ambassador to UN: Here’s the new report.
UN: This is just as stupid as the earlier stuff you handed in. Didn’t you read the questions?
Iraqi ambassador to UN: Yeah, but what are you going to do? Dumbasses.
USA: Right, that means we have to punish this guy under resolution 1441.
France: You need to get one more resolution for military action before you do that.
USA: And if we do, what will do you?
France: We’d veto it.
USA: Basically you are saying that no matter what resolution the international community has voted on, you don’t think we should enforce it?
France: In a word, no. But it’s because of the UN Charter that we have to all agree on military action before we do anything.
USA: Screw you, peacenik.
France: Screw you, warmonger.
George W. Bush: Tony, the French are being assholes. If we don’t enforce this, we’ll look dumb, the UN will look impotent, and Saddam Hussein could continue building up an arsenal. Whatever the case, we don’t know what that smug sonofabitch is doing.
Tony Blair: I agree, George. We either enforce the law, or we say that laws don’t matter. I couldn’t run a country like that.
Gordon Brown: I don’t know if he can run a country. I would do a better job and I have the same initials as the American guy.
John Howard: Count me in.
Jacques Chirac: I hate Americans. But I did meet that Saddam in 1975. Nice guy. We had dinner together.
Jiang Zemin: I like Americans. When they are at war, their economy will be in trouble and they will have to buy more stuff from us!
George W. Bush: Ladies and Gentlemen of the Congress, we have to go to war to enforce international law. Who’s with me?
Majority of Congress: We are.
Minority of Congress: We like French food.
Saddam Hussein: Looks like I’m f***ed. Get me Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf, the Information Minister!
France: Told you so, the Americans are warmongers.
Liberal media: Don’t worry, we’ll do what we can with slanted reporting to make the troops feel bad. And we’ll give that Information Minister dude a lot of air time.
Rupert Murdoch: Not on my watch. I can set Bill O’Reilly on you.
Now, I know I have missed out some facts to get it into summary format, and the Commander-in-Chief has been edited for fluency, but consider how long the last post was!
Comments
It's one helluva job getting the liberal media to consider that perhaps Bush and Blair aren't the devil's own representatives on earth, isn't it!?
Any excuse to prove that they (we) are the bad guys keeps them happy. They must all be members of the Masochists Anonymous Club.
I have a recent post on Blair's Iraq decision, and the limitations of politics here.
http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/iraq-blair-the-art-of-the-possible/
They DO believe that Bush went into Iraq for oil - nothing else. And they DO believe that WMDs and the dossier were invented as excuses for an invasion. This despite knowing that Saddam used WMDs against the Kurds. And they DO believe that Blair supported Bush ONLY for personal reasons of his own future post-premiership. Yet it's clear that Blair sacrificed his job and possibly his legacy because he BELIEVED in the Iraq invasion. He's said so himself.
Meanwhile they ignore the growing terrorism menace in the world and in the UK and the EU, as though it is of no consequence. Liberal democracy will "larn 'em" is their mantra.
It won't - it can't. Terrorists brainwash the naive and disenchanted and use them as sacrifices. Mostly youngsters, of course.
Your point about proving the common man is better etc, is a good one. Historically and habitually the Brits don't trust politicians. But since they trusted Blair in 1997 after 18 years of Conservative rule, the press tell them, as though chiding children for bad judgement, that they have been badly let down by this man.
The complete opposite is the case, imho.
I'm afraid the people are gullible too - the reason I got out of politics. Disillusioned with the voters!
Blair's feral beast speech before he left office is worth a re-visit too.
Might have to visit your link in the daytime as it’s 1.40 a.m. here and I have a 9.30 a.m. call to take. The 776 spams (no exaggeration—actually the opposite) I received since our last communication are annoying me a bit, too.
The blogging world is largely anti the status quo right now - but it was ever thus with the vocal.
And the "anti-war peace-makers" who want to string up Bush & Blair (!?) are the most vocal of all.
Wonder if that'll change any time soon? I doubt it.
776 spams - in your e-mail inbox or at your site? My blog isolates them pretty successfully for me to check, if I get round to it. And I have recently changed my e-mail address - which I dreaded at first - but it's been great in some ways. No more spams! Since the old e-mail address was on various websites being spidered for years it was susceptible. The new one won't be. I'll use ditchable hotmail addresses instead.
I saw a photo of him not long ago. He seemed funnier in uniform. Must be as a result of Hot Shots Part Deux.