Idiot’s guide to how the Iraq war started

Comments

[this is good]
This is hilarious but sadly true.
[這個好]
Thank you. It was after our commenting on an earlier post that I realized the facts were better delivered in summary form. I couldn’t resist the humour though.
[this is good]
Excellent stuff, Jack. Couldn't have put it better myself.

It's one helluva job getting the liberal media to consider that perhaps Bush and Blair aren't the devil's own representatives on earth, isn't it!?

Any excuse to prove that they (we) are the bad guys keeps them happy. They must all be members of the Masochists Anonymous Club.

I have a recent post on Blair's Iraq decision, and the limitations of politics here.

http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/iraq-blair-the-art-of-the-possible/


[這個好]
Thank you. What I don’t really get, Blair Supporter, despite my comedic efforts above, is why the liberal media and certain parties are so intent on destroying the truth. I imagine that ratings or readership are at issue, providing the feeling that the common man is better than his leaders. Will surf over to your blog in a sec!
I believe SOME of them are politically motivated and will build up anything they can find to those ends - the Tory Daily Mail in Britain, for example. And I do think that some of the others actually believe their own propaganda.

They DO believe that Bush went into Iraq for oil - nothing else. And they DO believe that WMDs and the dossier were invented as excuses for an invasion. This despite knowing that Saddam used WMDs against the Kurds. And they DO believe that Blair supported Bush ONLY for personal reasons of his own future post-premiership. Yet it's clear that Blair sacrificed his job and possibly his legacy because he BELIEVED in the Iraq invasion. He's said so himself.

Meanwhile they ignore the growing terrorism menace in the world and in the UK and the EU, as though it is of no consequence. Liberal democracy will "larn 'em" is their mantra.

It won't - it can't. Terrorists brainwash the naive and disenchanted and use them as sacrifices. Mostly youngsters, of course.

Your point about proving the common man is better etc, is a good one. Historically and habitually the Brits don't trust politicians. But since they trusted Blair in 1997 after 18 years of Conservative rule, the press tell them, as though chiding children for bad judgement, that they have been badly let down by this man.

The complete opposite is the case, imho.




A sad state of affairs from the British media, once proud, now just trying to get attention like screaming children in an age of declining newspaper readership and TV viewership. The facts are all in front of us about the UN resolutions, yet the media choose to ignore them—when even a Joe Bloggs like me can go to Hansard and copy and paste.
Ah, but they don't believe the "liar" Blair. They evidently think he lied to parliament and the rest of us.

I'm afraid the people are gullible too - the reason I got out of politics. Disillusioned with the voters!

Blair's feral beast speech before he left office is worth a re-visit too.


You are right, Blair Supporter—the people are gullible. I can only hope we can be there to turn the information-poor into the information-rich. One thing may well separate classes in future and it won’t be money, but knowledge. I cannot see the grip of the media disappear soon but it is weakening.
Might have to visit your link in the daytime as it’s 1.40 a.m. here and I have a 9.30 a.m. call to take. The 776 spams (no exaggeration—actually the opposite) I received since our last communication are annoying me a bit, too.
Hope you managed to get some shut-eye.

The blogging world is largely anti the status quo right now - but it was ever thus with the vocal.

And the "anti-war peace-makers" who want to string up Bush & Blair (!?) are the most vocal of all.

Wonder if that'll change any time soon? I doubt it.

776 spams - in your e-mail inbox or at your site? My blog isolates them pretty successfully for me to check, if I get round to it. And I have recently changed my e-mail address - which I dreaded at first - but it's been great in some ways. No more spams! Since the old e-mail address was on various websites being spidered for years it was susceptible. The new one won't be. I'll use ditchable hotmail addresses instead.


Don't you miss Baghdad Bob?
Inbox, and it got to 945 this morning. Then I went out and came back to 256. The spam filters are great but these are all bounces from idiots who sent spams with a forged from address—which happens to be one of ours. The spam filters on Wordpress and Blogger are very good these days.

I saw a photo of him not long ago. He seemed funnier in uniform. Must be as a result of Hot Shots Part Deux.

[this is good]
Dead funny and a powerful summary.
Thank you, Nick! I tried to be fair to both sides of the argument, too.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Jack Yan

About Me

Jack Yan
New Zealand
‘I think they’re wonderful. They have so much courage! Here they are, hurling through space on a molten rock at 67,000 miles an hour, and the only thing that keeps them in their shoes is their misplaced faith in gravity.’—John Lithgow as Prof Dick Solomon, in Third Rock from the Sun

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox

Magazines