I want the ’net to be an experimental utopia

[Cross-posted] What has dawned on me these days is that the ’net is no longer a place of escape. Not that long ago, businessmen like me could go online, easily find colleagues who were interested in making a difference on the planet. Go online now, and you’ll find spammers, petty jealousies, gossips—everything that you might confront in the physical world, but more invasive. The shield of civility often disappears, replaced by the biting tongues of those who are ill-educated, but think they are armed with all the knowledge of the ancients.
Inevitably, we will all congregate into groups, only to find that as those groups grow, the same pattern is followed. The ’net in general gave way to the blogosphere, where many of the better thinkers went. But as I watched the whole Jennifer Siebel-attacking matter unfold over the last week (SFist’s obsession seems unnatural, but try telling its contributors that), it is fair to conclude that the blogosphere is suffering from the forces that made the web clunkier, slower and less exciting. The new frontier, just like California must have been to its first settlers (I do mean the native Americans), gave way to the white settlers, lawlessness and disease, before an experimental civilization began to take root. That experimental, occidental civilization is now armed with the internet, slagging people off while ignoring the homeless people minutes away from their residences. It just seems easier to be nasty, but is it more natural given one’s humanity?
I imagine we must start with other communities, other groups, and hope that contact with the educated class rubs off some knowledge on to the ill-educated. We now live, at least in this medium, in a world of the information-rich and the information-poor, but even we must depend on schools and governments—perhaps online schools (?)—and the hope that reasoning is something we are born with. That the internet remains somewhere where all can learn and better themselves, not a medium where pettiness and hate are propagated.
The realignment of what the internet is must start with those of us who write in it, conducting ourselves in the hope that we are working toward a utopia that will, God willing, transmit its positive energy in to the real world.
Comments
We have arrived at the shores of an age, with 'blogs', where the objectivity of a view is determined by the subjective applause of ill-educated minds. Previously, prominence was accorded to the insightful - i.e. 1800s and before - now, with self-publishing; the mass influx of ill-educated minds into the 'blogosphere; their mutual validation of their ill-thought through 'opinions'; the validation of their superficial produce via 'bloggies', 'blookers'; the prominence accorded to those perspectives and personas most appealing to young minds; the redefinition of 'insightful' and 'worthy' is underway. This is where the perspectival produce of the just-past-pubescence is validated as worthy of emulation. If Rousseau, Marx, Proudhon, Jesus, the Buddha, J.S. Mll, amongst others, were born today, they would, if they were not already negatively underdeveloped by the omni/present culture, be banished to languish in ignominy for 'talking shit' - which basically refers to any issue that is not superficially handled or superficial.