Democrats reject Barack Obama for Dick van Patten

Comments

[this is good]
nice day :)
[this is good]
LOL Jack, I met Dick van Patten at Venice Beach on New Years Day for the Polar Bear Swim, Brad was a toddler and when I introduced him as "Bradford" Dick got a charge out of it.
Hilarious!
I am glad so far people have taken this post as it was intended. I was worried, when I wrote it, that a registered Democrat would come and correct me!
As it happens, I did watch Sen. Obama’s full speech. Since the convention coverage was way longer, the PBS commentary at the end was cut short in favour of Vincent Price in The Last Man on Earth.
Great post. lol. Have you read Obama's convention speech? Nearly the whole value of the speech is in the shshshsh its a secret. (the delivery) There really is nothing of substance in his work unless its associated with money and enemy's of America.
[這個好]
You are right. Judge Bob, I watched Sen. Obama’s speech in full and there did seem to be a lot of bullish, war-like rhetoric for someone who proclaims himself anti-war. The entire Russian–Georgian situation has exposed a great deal of ignorance given Sens. Obama’s and Biden’s beliefs in their internationalism. Georgia is a US customer of arms and Russia has been in South Ossetia since around the time President Clinton took office (where was the fighting talk then?); plus 90 per cent of South Ossetians have Russian nationality. I do not condone what Russia has done in stepping up its presence and attacking Georgia, but the way politicians there have made out it is a simple matter of invasion is incorrect. (Sec. Rice, far more an expert on Russian affairs than any of us will ever be in our lifetimes, has not gone so far as to demand a Russian pull-out; just a return to a status quo ante.)
An Iraqi troop pull-out will happen regardless of who gets in because the PM Maliki has asked for it, weeks before Sen. Obama’s visit, and the US is currently there at the request of an ally and sovereign government (never mind how they got in; I am stating the present diplomatic arrangement).
Sen. Obama has essentially revealed that it will be business as usual under him as far as foreign policy goes with an evolutionary policy (though admittedly he has been clearer than Sen. McCain, struggling to differentiate himself, in anunciating this); as to domestic and economic policy, I believe there will be differences in the US’s favour as he has so far stated, but just how far he will go in the face of technocratic donors to the Democratic Party remains a moot point. One good policy I have heard is the tax credits for companies that opt to remain onshore, but how easy will it be for a company to prove that to the IRS?
His strength on the night was acknowledging problems with the economy. McCain has, too, but he wishes to leave it to market forces to correct. I am a Keynesian (not ideally, but pragmatically) so naturally I am inclined against McCain on his proposal, but the American people need to make a choice as to which method they see is better.
And President Bush himself talked about alternative energies in a recent State of the Union address, and some US automakers have made headway on that front since—so even on that point, is Sen. Obama a fresh thinker, or is he taking the best rhetoric of the last eight years and restating it in a new and younger package?
I added the caveat of money and associations because O's associations with the extreme home grown and international terrorists and closely working with the homegrown version who is now using our education system to tear down all the best that America is and is working the system to get huge grants for his agenda. O has helped him get those grants. In 2006 as a state senator O went to Kenya to campaign for an extremist relative who after losing the election went on to burn a church with Christians in it. None of this is going to be heard in the news because the media are liberals and are in love with this guy. I have pictures of the documents that Odinga signed indicating he would initiate many Sharia type laws on Kenya when he became president. I can do a quick search and get the article that shows Odinga's involvement in the church burning. I have pictures of Obama campaigning with Odinga. This is worthy of media attention but it never gets mentioned. There is now a lawsuit to force O to prove his citizenship because his birth certificate is fake. Haven't heard it mentioned even on talk radio. The guy is seriously an enemy of America and holds very close to a communist ideology if it isn't in fact communist. Since the failure of his one sponsored bill in the Senate we haven't heard that mentioned either. That bill would have taxed America to fund a new UN service known as the Global Poverty Act which in essence subjugates American sovereignty to the UN including the 2nd amendment rights of American citizens.

I cannot believe the Dems still have not vetted this guy. I can't believe the media wouldn't do it either. And now, much of his baggage is being ignored by even talk radio. I wrote an article called the Audacity of Cons which goes through a lot of this.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Jack Yan

About Me

Jack Yan
New Zealand
‘I think they’re wonderful. They have so much courage! Here they are, hurling through space on a molten rock at 67,000 miles an hour, and the only thing that keeps them in their shoes is their misplaced faith in gravity.’—John Lithgow as Prof Dick Solomon, in Third Rock from the Sun
Bebo:
LucirePublisher
del.icio.us:
jackyan
Digg:
jackyan
Flickr:
lucire
MySpace:
jackyan
Other:
http://www.facebook.com/jack.yan
Technorati:
jackyan
Twitter:
jackyan
YouTube:
luciremagazine

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox

Magazines